January 28, 2012
<<  January 2012  >>
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31
Welcome
 
You are not currently logged in.
Keystone XL Pipeline Permit

 

For Immediate Release
January 18, 2012 
 
Contact
Jay Lederer
(202) 778-2626
 
 
 
Statement by
International Union of Operating Engineers General President James T. Callahan
on
Obama Administration’s Decision to Deny
the Keystone XL Pipeline Permit
 
 
 
Today’s announcement by the U.S. Department of State to withhold approval of the Keystone XL pipeline is a blow to America’s construction workers. As the sector hardest hit by the recession and one that still grapples with an unemployment rate of 16%, this project could have been a lifeline to thousands of unemployed Operating Engineers. 
 
The IUOE is deeply disappointed in the Administration’s decision. We will continue to work with our partners in labor and the industry to bring vital energy projects online and to create the kind of high-paying, skilled jobs that are so vital to our economy, our members and their families.
 
 
###
 
 

The International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE)represents more than 400,000 members in 123 local unions across the U.S. and Canada, including operating engineers who work as heavy equipment operators, mechanics, surveyors in the construction industry; stationary engineers in building and industrial maintenance; nurses and other health care workers; and public employees.

 


Download: IUOE Statement re Keystone XL decision (2).doc
The Local

 

Our Local

Although we are a Stationary Engineer Local, many would be surprised at the diverse and varied kinds of work our union members perform. The Local represents members in school districts, zoos, hospitals and medical centers, food processing and distribution centers, city and county governments, laundries, property management organizations, and utility districts.

Each organization where we have members has its own unique rules, policies, and procedures which must be taken into account when labor agreements are negotiated; many of our union standards are common to all locations. The concept of seniority in job selection, promotion, lay-off, and recall is a concept we strive to achieve for all members, regardless of the type of organization in which they work. “Just cause” for discipline or discharge, equal employment, license requirements, holiday and vacation language, benefits, shift premiums, medical insurance language for members and their dependents, and pensions are benefits and topics that are common among most, if not all, of our groups.



 

Bargaining Basics

Not all subjects of bargaining are created equal.  To some people, wage increases are more important than pension increases.  Others may value health care benefits more than either wages or pension.  Some may consider language regarding job security, contracting out, or seniority to be of primary importance.  The priorities are as many and varied as our membership.  Just as we do not value all subjects of bargaining the same, the law does not treat all subjects of bargaining the same.

   The courts have decided that some subjects of bargaining are mandatory, while others are permissive, and still others are illegal.  Mandatory subjects of bargaining are wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment.  Permissive subjects of bargaining are those that are not mandatory, or in other words, those that are outside of the scope of wages, hours, and working conditions, and not illegal.  Illegal subjects of bargaining are those that conflict with either state or federal law.  Examples of mandatory subjects of bargaining are: wages, pension, health and welfare, hours, seniority, management rights, discipline, grievance procedures, and health and safety issues.  Examples of permissive subjects of bargaining are: definition of the bargaining unit, union-recognition clause, internal union affairs, and settlement of unfair labor practice charges.  Examples of illegal subjects of bargaining are: closed shop clauses and hot-cargo clauses.

   The law treats mandatory, permissive and illegal subjects of bargaining differently.  The difference comes into play when one party to the bargaining insists on a subject to impasse.  While there is a duty to bargain, there is not a duty to reach an agreement.  There is nothing illegal about an employer insisting on a mandatory subject of bargaining to impasse.  This is not so with permissive and/or illegal subjects of bargaining.  A party to a bargain commits an unfair labor practice when it insists to impasse on either a permissive or an illegal subject of bargaining.

   Not all subjects of bargaining are created equal.  Different people place different values on different subjects.  And the law requires us to bargain some subjects, and also makes it illegal to insist on bargaining others.



Retirement

It is important to many Americans to secure a good union job with a wage that can support a family, provides health and welfare, and a good retirement.

   Many people in our society who are currently taking shots at public employee retirements forget that most public employees work for a lesser salary than their counterparts doing the same job in the private sector. Most times when people talk about those “huge” retirements, they are using the salaries of the highest earners in the public sector, such as large city managers, not the employees with union representation. The average public employee in Western Washington earns about $20 an hour. Let’s say an employee started working in the public sector 30 years ago for an employer participating in Washington’s Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS), when they retire they will be making around $25,000 per year.  And public employees receive little-to-no health-care coverage as part of their retirement.

   A recent conversation got around to public employee retirements and it was said that, “We have to do something about all these huge public employee retirements; we just can’t afford them.” But it could not be determined where the information about public employee retirements was heard or who it was about exactly. Remember to consider the source when you hear information like this and to find out exactly who it is about.

   And let’s talk about the importance of employers keeping their promises and honoring their agreements and about how the government had stepped in to dismantle the airline pilots’ pensions and how unfair it was to deny retirements to people who had worked for them as part of their compensation packages. Think about the time in your life when you may not be able to work and need your retirement.



What It Means to be Union

 “To remember the loneliness, the fear and the insecurity of men who once had to walk alone in huge factories, beside huge machines—to realize that labor unions have meant new dignity and pride to millions of our countrymen—human companionship on the job, and music in the home—to be able to see what larger pay checks mean, not to a man as an employee, but as a husband and as a father—to know these things is to understand what American labor means.”

Adlai Stevenson speech September 22, 1952

Not surprisingly, unions are very important to many Americans.  The difference in union jobs is that union positions pay better, have better hours, better benefits and do not always end in the dreaded layoffs that plagued families too many times.  More than that, union jobs give people a voice, so they are more inclined to participate in their own future, using the union to speak up to address wrongs that they witnessed by management done both to them and their fellow coworkers. 

    Some of the most important life lessons taught by unions are to value honesty, cooperation, reasonableness, and most importantly, personal and professional dignity or pride in a job well done.  It is believed all of these values are what makes belonging to a union so powerful. Unions help people to develop personally by investing in what they do professionally. 

   The National Labor Relations Board explains that the purpose of the creation of the National Labor Relations Act was to protect some of these core values.  “Congress enacted the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA") in 1935 to protect the rights of employees and employers, to encourage collective bargaining, and to curtail certain private sector labor and management practices, which can harm the general welfare of workers, businesses and the U.S. economy.”  The key here is the idea that by working together, both the employees through their unions and management, we all can promote the values of working people which will benefit not only the employees and the employer, but also society as a whole.  Indeed, the AFL-CIO’s mission statement sums it up well when it states, “The mission of the AFL-CIO is to improve the lives of working families, and to bring economic justice to the workplace and social justice to our nation.”  Notice that the AFL-CIO’s mission is not just for union members or union families, but to improve workplace rights for all people.

   What IUOE members need to realize is the difference between having a voice and being stifled in the workplace.  If you speak with some employees that are unorganized and work for non-union employers, you will notice that they have to accept whatever the employer gives them or risk losing their jobs.  However, you have the fortune of a collective bargaining agreement and union membership which means that you have a voice and you have rights.  The ability to have grievances filed on your behalf gives you rights, the ability to have the union to arbitrate grievances gives you rights, the ability to go to union meetings, vote and speak up gives you rights.  But you have to know your rights and take an active role in them.  You cannot take them for granted.

   It may be easy with the current middle class ideas of eight-hour workdays, weekends off, and improved wages to take for granted what many people fought for through the labor movement.  However, realize that nation-wide union memberships have declined significantly to around 11% in 2010 according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.  Additionally, there are some powerful forces at play attempting to destroy the unions.  The answer to this problem is to be informed and get involved.

  

WHAT IS A UNION? 
The simplest definition of a union is a group of two or more employees that band together as an organization to address with their employer hours, pay, and working conditions. Unions are also democratic entities.  Indeed they are one of the most democratic entities in the United States because their leadership at the national, regional and local levels are elected by their members. Unions are also guided by their constitutions and bylaws which are drafted and ratified by their members.  These constitutions and bylaws address policies on how to govern the union and details everything from leadership compensation to how to settle internal disagreements.
 
WHAT IS IT THAT UNIONS DO?
 
Unions promote and protect the interests of the working class, whether the employees are dues paying or non-dues paying, or even those who may never even be represented by a union.  Unions negotiate with the employer for written agreements for employees regarding their pay, benefits and working conditions. Unions represent their members in disciplinary processes and grievances for contract violations. Unions lobby for laws and regulations that protect working families on all levels of government. Unions offer members services to help employees outside the workplace.
 
WHAT HAVE UNIONS DONE FOR ME?
 
In the past, unions have fought for protections many Americans take for granted such as: minimum wage; the eight-hour workday; child labor laws; health and safety standards; and the weekend. Studies also show that a large union presence in an industry or region can raise wages for union and non-union workers alike.
 
WHY DO WE NEED UNIONS?
 
Most Americans (61%) believe that “labor unions are necessary to protect the working person.”Unions raise productivity on average by up to 24% in manufacturing, 16% in hospitals, and 38% in construction.  Union workers also have higher professional standards because the unions increase opportunities for worker training.  In fact, most unions even offer their own training (in our case, the Training Trust). For more information: www.americanrightsatwork.org.

 



 

Get Involved

GET INVOLVED WITH YOUR UNION

If you want to keep what you have, every member needs to get active to preserve their rights. Union membership is about participating in what is happening within your bargaining unit.

By attending meetings, you get updated on things that are happening at your workplace, and information is shared on things that are being discussed at Labor/Management Meetings throughout the year at these meetings.

Generally, your shop stewards are there to be your first line of communication if something is not right within the workplace. Seek those stewards out if you find yourself being questioned about something you are being accused of, or if you believe you have a grievance. They are there to help you.

And, as always you can make a call to your business representative.

TIP:  Know your contract, and know your employee rights.



 

Organize Today

 

 

ORGANIZE!

 

We warm our hands at a fire we did not build. Things we sometimes take for granted, like the right to collectively bargain, grievance and arbitration procedures to settle workplace disputes, wage increases, health care, pensions, even the eight hour day, were fought for and won on the picket line and at the bargaining table by the brave men and women of the labor movement who came before us.
   Currently, union density in the private sector is down to just under 8%. That is four times lower than what it was at its peak in 1955, and the lowest its been in 100 years. Unless we organize, the fire is in danger of going out. Do not think that there are not those who would like to put that fire out. Consider the case of Scott Brown, the newly elected Republican Senator from Massachusetts. Senator Brown could not wait to get to Washington D.C. In fact, he had his swearing in ceremony moved up for the sole purpose of making himself eligible to cast a vote to block President Obama's pro-labor nominee for a vacant seat on the National Labor Relations Board. Make no mistake, labor is under attack!
  Organizing is the key to survival. Not only does the labor movement need to increase membership, but existing numbers members need to ensure that the fire still burns for themselves and those who will come after them by supporting each other and punishing those who would put that fire out.

 

SOLIDARITY

The Dictionary defines "Solidarity" as: union or fellowship arising from common responsibilities and interests, as between members of a group or between classes, peoples, etc.: to promote solidarity among union members.


 

 

What's New at IUOE Local 286
New Business Representative

Updated On: Nov 30, 2011 (13:32:00)

 

WELCOME NEW BUSINESS REPRESENTATIVE

MICHAEL BOLLING

 

My name is Michael Bolling, and I am very happy to be allowed the opportunity to serve you as a Business Representative. I come from a hospital background of the trades and worked for Swedish Medical Center for nearly 15 years as an operating engineer. I also acted as shop steward at my campus for over 13 years.  I have been an active member in local 286 for at least 17 years and during those years, I have been on many different committees. I believe our strongest tool to success is communication and I look forward to meeting you all, and helping you with all the tools available to me.

 



NOTE FROM THE BUSINESS MANAGER

Updated On: Nov 30, 2011 (13:34:00)

 GENERAL PRESIDENT RETIRES

 General President Vincent J. Giblin is retiring in January. General Secretary-Treasurer James Callahan was elected to take over as General President, and Vice President Brian Hickey from Local 399 was elected to take over as General Secretary-Treasurer. We wish them well in their new positions, and General President Vincent J. Giblin in his retirement.



 

Legislative Report by Dave Westberg Local 609

Updated On: Apr 29, 2011 (11:15:00)

 

Brothers & sisters:
 
I just wanted to send out a note that both houses of the Legislature have passed and sent on to the governor, SHB 2021 which repeals post retirement Cost of Living Allowances (COLA) for PERS Plan 1 retirees who turn 65 and/or retire after July 1 of this year.
 
While we fought long and hard against this measure, it has a savings of hundreds of millions of dollars for the state.
 
What we did get was an increase in the “Minimum Monthly Benefit” so that no Plan 1 retirees will fall below a monthly benefit (before options such as survivor benefits, etc.) of $ 1500 per month. This minimum will be increased by the consumer price indicator (“CPI”) rate of inflation yearly.
 
Those who are nearing retirement on Plan 1 and may be near (or over 65) should think carefully about retiring before the end of June to keep the cola.
 
The governor has not yet signed the bill but there is little doubt that she will.
 
In unity,
 
Dave
 
Our Mission: Addressing and overcoming bureaucratic obstacles to finding real solutions in real time, daily



 
April 20, 2011
 
Final Days EDITION LEGISLATIVE REPORT
 
 
As the “Regular” 2011 Legislative session winds down through its final days, voices are heard discussing a special session which looks as if it will be necessary to iron out differences in the budget proposals of the two houses. In that it is very possible that the session will end and legislators leave town until an agreement is reached, this report is to cover some of the differences between the two proposals so that while negotiations take place, members can contact legislators and urge positions that protect employees and our families. THIS IS A CRITICAL POINT TO TAKE ACTION.
 
BUDGET
 
The Senate Budget proposal has now been passed by the full Senate was as bad as we had feared for K-12 classified employees districts in the state. Working families have a lot of interest in that proposal, as well as the versions between now and the final one. The Senate proposal was passed Monday by the full body.  
 
SALARY
 
The Senate budget proposal includes a cut of 3% of salary for all k-12 employees. This cut is to the salary allocation only, and if it were to be included in the final budget, could be made up for by local bargaining.  The language states:
 
Allocations to school districts for K-12 employees' salaries will be reduced by 3 percent for each of two upcoming school years, consistent with 3 percent reductions for general state employees.
However, a $10 million mitigation pool is established in the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction to proportionately restore earnings for employees with current salaries under $30,000.
 
Language goes on to parallel the furloughs that state employees have been required to take the last several years. The budget language that applies to state employee furloughs is stated thusly:
 
Savings are achieved through temporary layoffs for higher-paid state employees. The hours of temporary layoff required are: (1) for employees earning at least $50,000 per year but less than $75,000 per year, sixteen hours each fiscal year; (2) for employees earning at least $75,000 per year but less than $100,000 per year, thirty-two hours per fiscal year; (3) for employees earning at least $100,000 per year but less than $125,000 per year, forty-eight hours per fiscal year; and (4) for employees earning $125,000 per year or more, sixty-four hours per fiscal year.
 
Suffice it to say that we will be working to restore salary allocations in the coming days. However, there are a number of other forces in play as well so please call the Hotline and OPPOSE these proposed salary cuts to k-12 employees contained in the Senate budget proposal. Of the two, clearly the House proposal is better for the k-12 system and its employees. MESSAGES SHOULD FAVOR THE HOUSE BUDGET POSITION.
 
The Senate Ways & Means Committee did remove a particularly troublesome (for Districts) element of their proposal which was to cut funding when students were not at school. This would have saved the state some money but was a nightmare for individual districts and it was removed in committee.
 
Several times in the last few years, the COLA (Cost of Living Adjustments) for school employees has been “suspended”. Two years ago, it was suspended with a commitment that the state would begin making this up to employees in 2013 and beyond. This year, a similar suspension is pending. SB 5919 (Murray)  would eliminate any state commitment to make employees whole for these years while the state has given so many revenues to business and the community of wealth. The bill was heard in the Senate Ways & Means Committee on Friday, April 15th but was not voted out of that committee before the budget went “to the floor” for a vote. Since this bill can be considered “Necessary to Implement the Budget”, (“NTIB”) it remains in play and could move at anytime.
 
WE OPPOSE THIS BILL and ask all members to contact legislators in opposition to
SB 5919 today.
 
Classified employees have waited for years for the state to live up to its obligations and to now “eliminate” those obligations by bill is outrageous.
 
 PENSIONS
 
Both budget proposals presume the passage of one of the bills HB 2021/ SB 5920 that would repeal the “Uniform COLA” for Plan 1 retirees who retire and turn 66 in the future. We have opposed these proposals and a coalition of Public Employee unions that we are a part of has as well. Plan 1 has a “floor” (“Minimum Benefit”) for lower paid workers and the Governor’s proposal would continue to allow those recipients to continue to receive the COLA.   
 
Anyone reading this report, who may be considering retiring on Plan 1 soon, ought to keep close attention as Plan 1 employees retiring and turning 66 after July 1, 2011 may not get future cola’s.
 
HB 1742-would repeal both "improvements" (which allow for retirement before age 65 for long-term employees), for all Plans 2 & 3 new hires after July 1 of this year. Those of us still employed here now would continue to get these benefits but new employees would not. We oppose the bill.
 
EVERY MEMBER READING THIS MUST CALL THE LEGISLATIVE HOTLINE TODAY AND SEND THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE TO POLICY MAKERS IN OLYMPIA:
 
“STOP THE ATTACKS ON PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, VOTE NO ON  HB 1742, SB 5920 AND HB 2021”
 
K-12 HEALTH BENEFITS
 
There is no increase in the monthly allocation for health benefits next year and a cut of a little over $3 per month in the 2012-2013 school year.
 
There is language (as yet not fully explained) in the Senate proposal to explore voluntary centralized purchase of K-12 health benefits. The language looks like this:
 
“$1,200,000 of the general fund--state appropriation for fiscal year 2012 and $700,000 of the general fund--state appropriation for fiscal year 2013 are provided solely to plan and implement a voluntary program of consolidated public school employee health benefits purchasing. The office of the superintendent of public instruction shall establish interagency agreements with the state health care authority, the office of the insurance commissioner, and the office of financial management to provide a system allowing for a minimum of 5,000 and a maximum of 16,000 participants to enroll in the K-12 employees' health benefits pool for the 2012-2013 school year. If Senate Bill No. . . . is not enacted by June 30, 2011, this subsection shall lapse.”
 
For clarity, I include the following language from some of the documents released with the Senate proposal:
 
Funding is provided to OSPI for interagency agreements with the Washington State Health Care Authority, the Office of the Insurance Commissioner, and the Office of Financial Management to begin implementation of reforms to K-12 health benefits' purchasing. Beginning with school year 2012-13, a consolidated statewide purchasing program for public schools will be available on a voluntary bases in accordance with Senate Bill ..... Planning for implementation, convening the transition group, creating the infrastructure for the new system, and developing recommendations to the Legislature for final implementation will take place during the summer of 2011 and the 2011-12 school year. Implementation costs will be offset in Fiscal Year 2013 through initial net savings in health benefits allocations.
 
And:
 
Consolidated Health Benefits - Beginning with school year 2012-13, a consolidated statewide purchasing program for public schools will be available on a voluntary basis for a maximum of 16,000 participants. Health benefit allocations will be structured to provide a higher allocation to participants and a lower allocation to non-participants, resulting in net savings in the program.
 
I believe I now understand what policy makers think this will do. The idea is that a (blank, “Title only”) bill will be introduced in the next few days that will include the details.
 
The bottom line is that we have never been opposed to improving the system as it currently exists; we simply feel that since the implementation of the Federal Affordable Care Act (aka “Health Care Reform”) is set to occur in 2014, such expenditures are a waste of money.
 
We will be working to remove this provision in the next weeks. Really, it’s silly. There already is a consolidated statewide purchasing program for public schools. It is called the state Health Care Authority and about 3% of school employees have chosen it. Its benefits are simply just not as good as what we have now. Why the state should spend millions on re-casting this as a “new” program is beyond belief.
 
EVERY MEMBER READING THIS SHOULD CALL THE LEGISLATIVE HOTLINE WITH THE MESSAGE:
 
STOP THE ATTCKS ON SCHOOL EMPLOYEE HEALTH BENEFITS AND LOCAL COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AND VOTE TO OPPOSE EFFORTS TO SCALE BACK STATE SUPPORT FOR K-12 EMPLOYEE HEALTH BENEFITS.
 
Over the last several weeks, we have been pointing out that a better use of such funds would be to fund the “Meals for Kids” subsidy that funds free meals for “Reduced” status kids in many schools. This helps the Nutrition program and expands participation. The amount is $ 3 million per year and would be money much better spent than yet another study group on benefits.
 
POLICY BILLS
 
HB 1127 clarifies state public collective bargaining law to underscore the requirement that public employers bargain with the certified representatives rather than with individual union members. Employers are always looking for willing individuals who can be intimidated and frequently we see them doing all they can to avoid dealing with representatives elected to represent fellow workers. Many policy makers are unaware of the behavior of some elements of middle management in k-12 districts until they hear testimony. We supported the bill and it passed, it will be signed in the next week or so. 
 
These are just some of the issues that remain alive and a brief recap of those others we have worked on this session. Remember, our unified strengths in the areas of legislative actions are our communicating our priorities to elected leaders and holding them accountable. Each and every one of us needs to communicate our positions to policy makers (via the Legislative Hotline 1-800-562-6000 or directly to their offices) frequently. Please take the time to do so on any and all of the above issues. It makes everything we do in the halls of the capital much more effective.
 
Each and every one of us needs to communicate our positions to policy makers (via the Legislative Hotline 1-800-562-6000 or click on the Find Your Legislator link (type in your address and a map will appear of your district, click on a legislator and their home page will appear, click email and follow instructions). Please frequently take the time to do so on any and all of the above issues. It makes everything we do in the halls of the capital much more effective.
 
As always, thank you for your continuing support.

Download: Legislative Report Feb 2011.doc, Legislative Report March 2011.doc, House Legislative Report April 7 2011.doc, Senate Legislative Report April 11 2011.doc, Final Days Edition Legislative Report.doc


46633 visitors since Mar 29, 2010
Member Login
Username:

Password:


Not registered yet?
Click Here to sign-up.

Forgot Your Login?
Action Center
General Membership Meeting
Open to all Member's at the Union Hall in Auburn,18 E Street SW, on Thursday, June 14, 2012, at 7:30 p.m.
Important Links
International Union of Operating Engineers
Central Pension Fund
WA Teamsters Welfare & Trust - Northwest Administrators
302/612 Welfare & Pension Administration
IUOE Local 302
IUOE Local 612
Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO
Pierce County Central Labor Council, AFL-CIO
M.L. King County Labor Council
AFL-CIO
Puget Sound Labor Agency
Washington State Department of Labor and Industries
Unemployment Lifeline
Union Plus
Site Search
Site Map
RSS Feeds
Visit Unions-America.com!
 Top of Page © Copyright 2012, IUOE Local 286, All Rights Reserved.
Powered By UnionActive™
Hide the Right Hand Column